|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- What ISO 17025 requires regarding Uncertainty of Measurement
- How to measure uncertainty of measurement
- When to measure uncertainty of measurement
- What to do about reporting and recording UM
|
|
3
|
- Clause 5.4.6.2 requires that:
- ... Testing laboratories shall have and shall apply procedures for
estimating uncertainty of measurement
|
|
4
|
- UM only applies to quantitative data
|
|
5
|
- Clause 4.13.2.1 requires that:
- ... The records for each test or calibration shall contain sufficient information
to facilitate, if possible, identification of factors affecting the
uncertainty ...
|
|
6
|
- Clause 5.4.1 requires that
- ...(when validating a method the laboratory shall include) ... where
appropriate, an estimation of the measurement uncertainty ...
|
|
7
|
- Clause 5.4.4 requires that...
- ...For new test and/or calibration methods, procedures should be
developed prior to the tests and/or calibrations being performed and
should contain at least the following information:
- ... k) the uncertainty or
the procedure for estimating uncertainty.
|
|
8
|
- Clause 5.4.5.2 requires the laboratory to confirm that the methods are
fit for the intended use and states in NOTE 2 that the techniques used
for the determination of the performance of a method should be one of,
or a combination of, the following:
- ... assessment of the
uncertainty of the results based on scientific understanding of the
theoretical principles of the method and practical experience.
|
|
9
|
- Clause 5.4.6.1 requires that a calibration laboratory, or a testing
laboratory performing its own calibrations, shall have and shall apply a
procedure to estimate the uncertainty of measurement for all
calibrations and types of calibrations.
- Best advice on this one: DON'T
GO THERE
|
|
10
|
- Direct measurement
- Mean and SD from repeatability studies during validation
- Control charts
- Estimation
- Experience and conservative distributions
- Uncertainty budgets
|
|
11
|
- Clause 5.4.6.2 states that in certain cases the nature of the test
method may preclude rigorous, metrologically and statistically valid,
calculation of uncertainty of measurement.
- In these cases the laboratory shall at least attempt to identify all the
components of uncertainty and make a reasonable estimation
|
|
12
|
- Clause 5.4.6.2 goes on to state that the laboratory:
- ...shall ensure that the form of reporting of the result does not give
a wrong impression of the uncertainty.
- ...Reasonable estimation shall be based on knowledge of the performance
of the method and on the measurement scope and shall make use of, for
example, previous experience and validation data.
|
|
13
|
- Clause 5.4.6.2 ends with NOTES
- NOTE 1 The degree of rigor needed in an estimation of uncertainty of
measurement depends on factors such as:
- the requirements of the test method;
- the requirements of the customer;
- the existence of narrow limits on which decisions on conformity to a
specification are based.
|
|
14
|
- NOTE 2 to clause 5.4.6.2 states:
- ... In those cases where a well-recognized test method specifies limits
to the values of the major sources of uncertainty of measurement ... the
laboratory is considered to have satisfied this clause by following the
test method
|
|
15
|
- Clause 5.4.6.3 requires that when estimating the uncertainty of
measurement, all uncertainty components which are of importance in the
given situation shall be taken into account using appropriate methods of
analysis.
|
|
16
|
- Clause 5.10.3.1 requires that test reports shall, where necessary for
the interpretation of the test results, include the following:
- ...
- c) where applicable, a statement on the estimated uncertainty of
measurement; information on uncertainty is needed in test reports when
it is relevant to the validity or application of the test results, when
a customer's instruction so requires, or when the uncertainty affects
compliance to a specification limit;
|
|
17
|
- ILAC Guide 19 states that the reporting requirements of ISO 17025 clause
10 can be met by ensuring that the case record relating to a specific
investigation contains all the relevant information required by ISO/ IEC
17025.
|
|
18
|
- UM definition
- Direct measurement
- Estimation based on professional judgement
- Uncertainty budgets
|
|
19
|
- A parameter associated with the result of a measurement, that
characterizes the dispersion of the values that could reasonably be
attributed to the measurand
|
|
20
|
- Replicate measurements on a typical sample
- Concentration range
- Operators and time influences
- Matrix effects
- Replicate measurements on spiked samples
- Shewhart control charts
- Calculate standard deviation assuming a normal distribution of results
- This is a direct measure of dispersion
- This is known as a Type A estimate of UM
|
|
21
|
- Use professional judgement to set a reasonable range about the observed
value
- The expanded uncertainty, U
- Set the acceptable degree of latitude around the mean
- Define distribution nature and calculate standard deviation
- This is called a Type B estimate
|
|
22
|
- If we do not know how the results are distributed around the mean and
have no reason to assume any bias for example a clustering around the
mean, then the measurement dispersion (standard deviation) to be used
is:
- This distribution is sometimes referred to as a rectangular distribution
|
|
23
|
- If we can reasonably assume that there is a clustering around the mean,
then the measurement dispersion (standard deviation) to be used is:
|
|
24
|
- 30 replicate analyses of a blood sample containing approximately 0.09
g/dl of ethanol gave a standard deviation of 0.0018 g/dl
- This establishes the UM for that test as 0.0018
- For k = 99.5% we use three times the standard deviation
- Therefore 99.5% of values for repeated assays would lie in the range
mean +/- 0.0054 g/dl
- Note that the 0.5% not included is made up of 0.25% above the (mean + 3
SD) and 0.25% below the (mean – 3 SD)
|
|
25
|
- A firearms examiner conducts a distance estimation by measuring the
diameter of residue deposition, and concludes that “the gun was
fired from 18 inches give or take 6 inches either way”
- This translates as a mean of 18 inches and a half width interval of 6
inches
- Measurement dispersion (standard deviation) is 6 divided by the square
root of 6 if we assume results are clustered around the mean or 6/√3
if we assume a rectangular distribution
|
|
26
|
- Rectangular distribution:
- Standard Deviation = 6/√3 = 6/1.73 = 3.47
- Triangular distribution:
- Standard Deviation = 6/√6 = 6/2.45 = 2.45
|
|
27
|
- We know the relationship between standard deviation and dispersion:
- 67% of values lie in the range mean +/- 1SD
- 95% of values lie in the range mean +/- 2 SD
- 99.7% of values lie in the range mean +/- 3 SD
|
|
28
|
- Say we wish to have 95% coverage and assume a triangular distribution:
- 95% of derived distance values will lie in the range 18 plus or minus 2
times 2.45
- That is, between 13.1 and 22.9 inches
- Note that this is not the same as saying there is 95% probability that
the gun was fired from between 13.1 and 22.9 inches
|
|
29
|
- Identify all contributing factors
- Calculate variances
- Add variances
- Calculate dispersion from square root of the sum of variances
|
|
30
|
- You MUST have a record of UM for every quantitative measurement that you
will report and that is either required by the customer or where a
decision on conformity will be made based on your reported measurements
|
|
31
|
- Remember that Clause 5.4.6.2 requires that:
- ... Testing laboratories shall have and shall apply procedures for
estimating uncertainty of measurement
- All quantitative method validations must include a UM estimate
|
|
32
|
- ISO 17025 has several requirements regarding uncertainty of measurement
for quantitative testing
- One of these is that you must have and apply procedures for estimating
UM for all your quantitative procedures
- You do not need to report UM in every case
|